Abel Versus Cain's Sacrifice

Abel, the son of Adam and Eve, is the first person listed among many, in Hebrews chapter 11, commended by the Holy Spirit for their faith. Of Abel it is said, "By faith Abel offered to God a more excellent sacrifice than Cain, through which he obtained witness that he was righteous, God testifying of his gifts; and through it he being dead still speaks." (Heb. 11:4 NKJV) Men have long been troubled by this passage trying to figure out why Abel's sacrifice was pleasing to God while his brother Cain's was not. That is the topic of this article.

In Gen. 4:2-5 we read about the offering as follows: "Now Abel was a keeper of sheep, but Cain was a tiller of the ground. And in the process of time, it came to pass that Cain brought an offering of the fruit of the ground to the Lord. Abel also brought of the firstborn of his flock and of their fat. And the Lord respected Abel and his offering, but He did not respect Cain and his offering. And Cain was very angry, and his countenance fell." (NKJV)

It is worthwhile to read what followed, seemingly not long afterwards, in a conversation between God and Cain. "So the Lord said to Cain, 'Why are you angry? And why has your countenance fallen? If you do well, will you not be accepted? And if you do not do well, sin lies at the door. And its desire is for you, but you should rule over it.'" (Gen. 4:6-7 NKJV) It doesn't seem like a lot to go on, these few verses, but there is more here than meets the eye when one begins to meditate on what we are told.

First, I ask the question of how Abel and Cain knew anything at all about sacrifices and offerings to God. Where did such a concept of making offerings to God come from? How did the idea of such a thing even enter their minds? We do not think about things of which we know nothing. My grandparents died in the nineteen sixties. How much time do you think they spent thinking about computer coding. They never heard of a computer. It was impossible for them to conceive such thoughts living when they did and so I ask again where did Abel and Cain get the idea about making an offering to God (the writer of the book of Hebrews calls it a sacrifice)?

The answer has to be that such information was supplied by God himself either in direct speech to them or through commandments given to their parents (Adam and Eve) and thus passed on down to them from parent to child. That God spoke directly with not only Adam and Eve but also with Cain we see from Gen. 4:6-7 and Gen. 4:9-15. Jesus, in the New Testament, in Luke 11:49-51, includes Abel with the prophets so we know God spoke to him as well. A prophet was one who proclaimed God's will and not just necessarily one who only foretold things to come. The point being, ideas have to have a source. The source was God either directly or indirectly.

Furthermore, I would add that without direction from God how could Abel know it would please God to kill an animal as a sacrifice? Adam and Eve were directed while in the Garden of Eden to eat of herbs and the fruit of trees (Gen. 1:29) and when driven out of the garden they were to eat of the herbs of the field (Gen. 3:18). Nothing was said, that is revealed in scripture, about killing animals in those early days of man's existence on earth. Thus for Abel to take this bold step God must have revealed to him that it was okay to do so.

We are thus at the point where I believe God gave directions for making offerings/sacrifices. I think this can be further confirmed by a passage found in the New Testament--Rom. 10:17. "So then faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of God." (NKJV) How can you have faith when you are flying blind without any word from God? Is an "I think so" or an "it seems to me," faith? Is that the definition of faith? That is opinion, not faith.

The writer in the book of Hebrews (11:4) says Abel's sacrifice was by faith. When one acts by faith in the Bible he is acting in confidence, not in doubt. He is not guessing or hoping. Well, how could Abel be so confident about his sacrifice? There is only one way and that is if he had received instructions from God as to how to sacrifice. That would include the procedure for doing so and also what it was that was to be sacrificed. In following what he was told he would have no doubt about the acceptability of his sacrifice. If you are just guessing or hoping your offering will be pleasing how can it be said you are acting by faith?

Why is it that there is no text saying that Cain's sacrifice was "by faith?" Could it be because it was not? Could it be because Cain had personal doubts about it himself? Why was it that Cain did not sacrifice "by faith?" Surely, if Abel was able to sacrifice "by faith" Cain should have been able to do likewise. Had Cain made a sacrifice "by faith" would God have been displeased?

The Bible says God "did not respect Cain and his offering." (Gen. 4:5 NKJV) One has to ask why not? If both were doing the very best they could, why not? Could it be that Cain was not doing the best he could? God asks Cain, "Why are you angry?" (Gen. 4:6 NKJV) God's rejection of his offering had made Cain angry. God then says to him, "If you do well, will you not be accepted?" (Gen. 4:7 NKJV) Evidently, then, Cain had not done well. But, he could only know how to do well if he had information as to how that was to be done. It is implied he could have done well. Thus again we see that both Cain and Abel must have had information about making sacrifices (offerings) that would please God and Cain had failed to follow the instructions.

By means of his sacrifice (and the manner in which it was made--by faith), it is said that Abel "obtained witness that he was righteous, God testifying of his gifts." (Heb. 11:4 NKJV) This was not said of Cain but I ask the question, "could it have been?" Was it impossible for Cain to make an acceptable sacrifice? That Cain knew all he needed to know to make such a sacrifice is self-evident. God is not a respecter of persons (Acts 10:34). Cain's failure was just that--Cain's failure. He had none to blame other than himself.

Why is it said that Abel was righteous? The Psalmist said, "all your commandments are righteousness." (Psalm 119:172 NKJV) In his sacrifice it seems Abel was obeying a command from God as to what to sacrifice. Do not misunderstand. No man is righteous on his own merits for all sin but neither can a man or woman be righteous and not obey God's commands. But this passage from Psalms, combined with the Hebrews 11:4 passage, is just another indication that Abel was being obedient to God in his offering.

1 John 3:12 throws some additional light on why Cain murdered his brother Abel. "Cain...was of the wicked one and murdered his brother. And why did he murder him? Because his works were evil and his brother's righteous." (NKJV) When God failed to respect Cain and his offering it threw Cain into a rage. He later killed Abel out in the field due to his anger and jealousy. The text in 1 John says the motive was "his works were evil and his brother's righteous." (NKJV) His works, his offering, did not have to be evil. Even a tiller of the ground could find a way to make an animal sacrifice. He could have if he would have.

Rather than find repentance when God spoke to him in Gen. 4:6-7, a time when God was giving him, we might say, a second chance to do right, Cain goes off instead and commits murder giving full vent to anger, hatred, and jealousy. He lived not for God or even for his own family. He sought vengeance on Abel when it was not Abel but God who rejected his offering.

This is a good time to make a point about faith and what it is. Faith that is pleasing to God is not faith in God's existence alone. God spoke to Cain. Cain had no doubt about God's existence. He did not need faith in God's existence for he had firsthand knowledge of it. So, faith that God lives is not saving faith. There is more to it than just that. "You believe that there is one God. You do well. Even the demons believe and tremble!" (James 2:19 NKJV) Do we believe Cain and the demons were saved? If not we need to continue to study to learn what saving faith is. It certainly involves more than just believing God exists in the heavens.

The writer of the book of Hebrews says of Abel that he "obtained witness that he was righteous." (Heb. 11:4 NKJV) Jesus declared him righteous in Matt. 23:35. He became such by faith. Abel died a righteous man. He was a man of faith who heard God's word, believed it, and obeyed it. There is no saving faith where a man simply hears God's words with the ear and then goes off in disobedience doing his own thing. A man of faith trusts God's words for God spoke them and thus they are trustworthy. In obeying them one is obeying God and manifesting faith in him.

We do not know what all Abel knew about sacrifice to God but we do know he followed by faith what he had been told and did not deviate from it for his trust was in the one who had directed him. The lesson for all of us--trust what God has told us in his word and do it for in doing it we will be "by faith" acting as did Abel. Don't go off and live a life of "it seems good to me and so God must be pleased." Do what he says, not what you think he should have said, or what seems satisfying to you personally. Remember his words, "'For My thoughts are not your thoughts, Nor are your ways My ways,' says the Lord." (Isa. 55:8 NKJV) 

[To download this article or print it out click here.]

Misunderstanding The Grace of God

Several years ago I submitted an article to an online site that said it was a Christian article directory.  It was a short article entitled "Receiving the Gospel."  It was deemed to be unfit for a Christian article directory.  The editor of the directory said to me in an e-mail that he believed man was saved by grace without baptism which, in the context of the article submitted, meant without obeying Peter's directive on the Day of Pentecost as found in Acts 2:38.

His position was not uncommon then or now.  Millions of people have read Paul's statement in Eph. 2:8-9, "for by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, not of works, lest anyone should boast" (NKJV) and said,  "okay, that is it, end of the story."  There is no need to study further.

I want to say first of all that is a poor approach to God's word to isolate and elevate part of his word over and above the rest of his word.  That approach makes you and me judge over the word; we make ourselves God and decide what is vital in the word and what is not.  Jesus when tempted by the devil said that "man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God." (Matt. 4:4 NKJV)  That’s "by every word … of God," not just by the words of one's choosing.

In the second place, it needs to be pointed out that nearly every single person who claims to be a Christian believes salvation is by grace through faith, including myself.  Is there a person on earth who thinks he has always done the right thing and never sinned?  I can name many of my sins.  Some of them have been an embarrassment to me, all of them of which I am aware have lowered my self-esteem, some have hurt others, all have hurt my relationship with God.  I will never be the person I could have been due to the sin in my life.  How about you, if you are honest, how about you?  Yes, we are saved by grace for we are undeserving of salvation.

Grace is often defined as unmerited favor, the unmerited favor of God toward man, and that hits the mark pretty close to dead center.  When one knows he is a sinner he knows that on his own merits, he does not deserve salvation.  I have often thought I needed to be punished, could almost wish I could do it myself.  There is no thought of deserving anything other than that—punishment.

Grace encompasses all the good things God has done for us in bringing us salvation.   When God sent Jesus into the world was that not an act of grace?  When Jesus went to the cross for us shedding his blood for our salvation was that not God's grace? 

When God gave us his word was that not an act of grace?  When God confirmed his word by signs and wonders in the first century allowing us to know that it was God giving the word was that not an act of grace?

There is a passage in Rom. 2:4 that bears on the thing I am trying to get at.  It says, "Or do you despise the riches of His goodness, forbearance, and longsuffering, not knowing that the goodness of God leads you to repentance?" (Rom 2:4 NKJV)  Is this not God's grace?  Is not his goodness, forbearance, and longsuffering toward us that we might repent of our sins God's grace?

Peter says, "The Lord is not slack concerning His promise, as some count slackness, but is longsuffering toward us, not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance." (2 Peter 3:9 NKJV)  Is this not grace?  Just God giving us time to get our life in order is that not grace?  Yes, we are saved by God's grace working in so many different ways for our salvation without which we could not be saved, none of us.  

But here is my problem with those in the denominational world on the subject of grace.  Their idea is that one is essentially saved by God's grace alone without man being under any obligation to do anything.  They see grace as unconditional, dependent only upon faith.

They reject baptism as essential to salvation.  I see it as another aspect of God's grace.  If God tells me to do something to have my sins forgiven ("repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins"--Acts 2:38 KJV) he was under absolutely no obligation whatsoever to give me that option whereby my sins could be forgiven.  I was shown grace by him telling me what to do and giving me a promise that upon doing it my sins will be forgiven--that to me is an act of grace on his part.

Denominationalists argue that it is not, that it’s works.  Their idea is that there is nothing you can do for salvation other than depend on God's grace with the idea being that it is a kind of a one-time packaged deal given to you at the point of belief by which you are then and there saved without any further action on your part.  Lest anyone misunderstand I am talking about initial salvation.

That thinking reminds me of a Christmas gift I received in the past.  I received a gift card.  To use it I had to get in the car, drive a distance, take up my time and make an effort, find what I wanted, drag it up to checkout, haul it out to the car, drive home, and unload it.  Nevertheless, I saw the gift card as an act of grace on the part of the giver.  I never once said, "This is work, not a gift."  In fact, I will take all of the gift cards you want to give me and praise you for your grace towards me despite the fact I will have to put forth a little effort to get the benefit of them.  

Jesus said, "Not everyone who says to Me, 'Lord, Lord,' shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven." (Matt. 7:21 NKJV)  When Peter said, "repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins" (Acts 2:38 KJV), when Ananias told Saul, "arise and be baptized, and wash away your sins" (Acts 22:16 NKJV), I wonder was that the will of the Father in heaven?  Was that grace?  What do you think?  Can you be saved without doing the will of the Father?  Jesus says no, most denominational people say, in the case of baptism, yes.

But, let me talk a little about salvation by grace through faith versus salvation by works.  Paul talks at length about this in the book of Romans and in Galatians.  Under the Law of Moses, a man was required to keep the law perfectly to be saved.  None could do so, thus obviously none could be saved on that basis.  

This was true of the Law of Moses, but it is just as true of any law that a perfect God might give to mankind.  Paul says, "For if there had been a law given which could have given life, truly righteousness would have been by the law." (Gal. 3:21b NKJV)  John says much the same to us for in speaking to Christians he says, "If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us." (1 John 1:8 NKJV)  Sin is a transgression of the law of God, "Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law." (1 John 3:4 KJV)

God has a law today.  He has always had a law.  Today's law is the law of Christ (Gal. 6:2, 1 Cor. 9:21).  But, no matter how much we might desire to do so and despite our best efforts, we cannot keep the law of Christ perfectly any more than the children of Israel could keep the Law of Moses perfectly, thus if there is to be salvation it must be by grace, which it is.

Does this then mean that man can ignore Jesus' commands and disbelieve the things Jesus said whether he said them directly or indirectly (through the inspired writers of the New Testament)?  If grace comes through faith, what kind of faith is it that will not believe that which has been spoken or written by inspiration?  If the Lord speaks and I claim to be a man of faith, will I not believe his words?  Grace comes through faith (Eph. 2:8), but does it come through a faith that disbelieves those things plainly written?  The language the inspired writers used about baptism is too clear for misunderstanding as to its purpose.    

Let us take a closer look at Paul, who wrote a great deal about salvation by grace and faith.  (We act as though that is all he wrote on the subject of salvation.)  The very same man that wrote Eph. 2:8 ("for by grace you have been saved through faith") also wrote Gal. 3:26-27, "(26) For you are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus. (27) For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ." (NKJV)  Many, perhaps even most in denominational churches, taking the smorgasbord approach, will take verse 26 and leave off verse 27.  That cannot be done by a man of genuine faith.  The man of faith believes all God has said on a subject.  The denominationalist says you put on Christ at the point of faith, mental assent.  Paul says not so.  Paul says by grace I have been saved through faith and then tells me I put on Christ in baptism, not before baptism.  Will I believe all Paul said or just what I want?

But, here is the clincher that destroys all arguments that attempt to separate baptism from grace.  Paul, who, remember, said "by grace you have been saved" (Eph. 2:8 NKJV), writes in 2 Tim. 2:1, "You therefore, my son, be strong in the grace that is in Christ Jesus." (NKJV)  Where is saving grace found?  In Christ Jesus.  Okay, how does Paul say we get into Christ Jesus?  He says, "Do you not know that as many of us as were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into His death?" (Rom 6:3 NKJV)  And he makes the same statement in Gal. 3:27 when he says, "as many of you as were baptized into Christ." (NKJV)  Anyone who can put two and two together can add the same here.

Paul said the same thing earlier in the book of Romans when he said that we are "justified freely by His grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus." (Rom 3:24 NKJV)  A person thus seeking to be saved by the grace of God ought to get into Christ Jesus where redemption is found; there and there only will he find grace and salvation.  The New Testament tells us too clearly to misunderstand how to get into Christ.

In Christ, there is salvation (2 Tim. 2:10), eternal life (Rom. 6:23), a new creation (2 Cor. 5:17), every spiritual blessing (Eph. 1:3), forgiveness (Eph. 4:32), the promise of life (2 Tim. 1:1), redemption (Rom. 3:24), being alive to God (Rom 6:11), and grace (2 Tim. 2:1).  When we are baptized, we are baptized into the body of Christ (1 Cor. 12:13).  One who has not been baptized is outside the body of Christ and thus outside all of the blessings that are found only in Christ.  All good things are found in Christ, not out of him.  That includes grace as clearly shown for all who will accept 2 Timothy 2:1.

Bible faith by which God's grace comes is a faith that believes what God has said so strongly that he does not question it, but if God has said it, the matter with him is settled.  The true man of faith does not need to hear a passage on baptism but once, and whatever is said on that topic, he immediately believes and is ready to obey, if he has not already done so.

Yes, it may take some study to see how all of the things by which God has said we are saved work together in a harmonious whole, but if it is said by God or one of his inspired messengers that we are saved by baptism (1 Peter 3:21), or receive forgiveness of sins in baptism (Acts 2:38), or put on Christ in baptism (Gal. 3:27), then a genuine man of faith says immediately "it is so."  They do not argue about how it is not so.

Paul himself was saved by grace, as we all are, yet he was not saved before baptism by grace alone.  Hear his personal story.  On his way to Damascus to persecute Christians, as one who did not believe, the Lord confronted him and he was made a true believer and repented of his sins.  Luke tells us when confronted by the Lord that Saul (Paul) trembled and was astonished (Acts 9:6).  He was told by the Lord himself to "go into the city, and you will be told what you must do." (Acts 9:6 NKJV)

Denominational doctrine almost across the board, meaning no matter what group you are talking about, has him now saved.  He believes and has repented and "by grace are ye saved through faith" (Eph. 2:8 KJV) so they see him as saved.  The trouble of it is, is that Jesus told him he had to go into the city where it would be told him "what you must do." (Acts 9:6)  So, whatever he must do has not yet been told him at the point of faith and repentance.

Then we see that for the next 3 days this saved man (?) is living in misery rather than rejoicing in his salvation.  Luke says, he "neither ate nor drank" (Acts 9:9 NKJV) during that whole time; why not?  Is it not because he does not yet know what it is he "must do?" (Acts 9:6)  I might add the thing he must do, whatever it was to be, was related to having his sins forgiven.  How do I know?

Saul already knew what the future held for him for in Acts 26:16-18 he says Jesus told him when he appeared to him on the road to Damascus.  He knew he would be God's servant and sent to the Gentiles to preach even before entering the city of Damascus. (Acts 26:16-18)  That was not going to be the thing he was going to be told he must do when he entered the city of Damascus, for that he already knew.

What was it he was told he must do?  Ananias told him, "And now why are you waiting? Arise and be baptized, and wash away your sins, calling on the name of the Lord." (Acts 22:16 NKJV)  He was told to be baptized to wash away his sins.  That was what he must do.  So here we have a man saved by grace and we know exactly how he was saved.  He had faith, he had repented of his sins, and he was baptized to wash away his sins.

Was he saved by grace?  Yes!  When he obeyed he was saved by God's grace for he was then in Christ where salvation is found.  His sins had been washed away by the grace of God for he had believed and obeyed God.

Do you want to be saved by grace?  You can try it the denominational way if you so desire but my advice to you would be that I would try it the Bible way by doing what Paul did.  You cannot go wrong doing that.

[To download this article or print it out click here.]

Misreading Reality

After Judah and Jerusalem had been destroyed by the Babylonians and the people deported, and carried away captive back to Babylon, the remnant remaining defied God and left for Egypt. The Bible says, "for whatever things were written before were written for our learning" (Rom 15:4 NKJV) and there is certainly a lesson to be learned from the way that remnant misread reality, a lesson to be applied in our time. Because of their misperception, they experienced catastrophe.

After Nebuchadnezzar captured Jerusalem and destroyed the city he carried away captive, back to Babylon, most of the people who remained alive, but left some of the poor people of Judah with a man named Gedaliah to govern over them. When Jews who had been scattered roundabout heard about Gedaliah, being left to govern, they returned to Judah (Jer. 40:11-12). However, a plot was hatched by the king of the Ammonites to have Gedaliah murdered (Jer. 40:14), which took place (Jer. 41:2-3), creating great fear among the Jews, fearing that Nebuchadnezzar would seek revenge on them for this killing even though they had nothing to do with it (Jer. 41:17-18).

Their desire was to flee to Egypt where they thought they would be safe. They sought out Jeremiah to inquire of the Lord what they should do. This he did, the Lord telling them if they would remain in Judah it would go well with them, he would save them, but if they were to go to Egypt "then it shall be that the sword which you feared shall overtake you there in the land of Egypt." (Jer. 42:16 NKJV)

Here is our first lesson written for our learning—sin deceives. They did not believe Jeremiah, "You speak falsely!" (Jer. 43:2 NKJV) We are now some 40 chapters into Jeremiah. Jeremiah has been prophesying to them for years about Nebuchadnezzar and his prophecies have all come to pass. Is he, Jeremiah, now to be judged a liar? They have every assurance he is speaking the truth but they cannot accept it. Why not?

Certainly, it is a lack of faith but why? It is hard to trust one you have been away from for so long. They had been steeped in idolatry which is why Judah was destroyed by the Babylonians, God calling Nebuchadnezzar his servant (Jer. 25:9). He was God's instrument to punish. They had come to trust in their idolatry, as we shall see as we continue on. They had lost trust in God. Jeremiah was God's spokesman.

The writer of the book of Hebrews warns of being "hardened through the deceitfulness of sin." (Heb. 3:13 NKJV) The prodigal son of Luke 15 thought things were going well, until they weren't. The Bible says "when he came to himself" (Luke 15:17 NKJV) he repented (verses 18-19). There is a sense when one gets caught up in sin that he does not think right, he is reading life wrong, judging matters incorrectly, thinking wrong, but he/she does not think so. Sin is deceitful.

Sometimes one's life has to be almost destroyed before you can get the person to change their thinking. The Jewish people finally got out of pagan idolatry once and for all but at what an awful price. In our own time, we see how the Japanese got out of Emperor worship and the Germans out of Nazism but it took destruction to bring it about.

"The heart is deceitful above all things." (Jer. 17:9 NKJV) "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." (Pro. 14:12 NKJV) Both of these passages assuredly apply to the Jews of that time but they also apply to you and me today. Our heart tells us this or that but how reliable is it? We are persuaded we are doing the right thing but are we? These Jews were sure going to Egypt was the right move.

Upon the arrival of the remnant of the Jews in Egypt and their settlement, Jeremiah continued to speak to them God's word. "Why do you commit this great evil against yourselves … in that you provoke Me to wrath with the works of your hands, burning incense to other gods in the land of Egypt." (Jer. 44:7-8 NKJV)

Hear their reply.

"Then all the men who knew that their wives had burned incense to other gods, with all the women who stood by, a great multitude, and all the people who dwelt in the land of Egypt, in Pathros, answered Jeremiah, saying: "As for the word that you have spoken to us in the name of the LORD, we will not listen to you! But we will certainly do whatever has gone out of our own mouth, to burn incense to the queen of heaven and pour out drink offerings to her, as we have done, we and our fathers, our kings and our princes, in the cities of Judah and in the streets of Jerusalem. For then we had plenty of food, were well-off, and saw no trouble. But since we stopped burning incense to the queen of heaven and pouring out drink offerings to her, we have lacked everything and have been consumed by the sword and by famine." (Jer. 44:15-18 NKJV)

Yes, they badly misread reality. They thought the good life they had enjoyed was because of their idolatry. The reality was it was because of God's great patience and longsuffering, granting them time and opportunity for repentance but they could not see that. They did not know "the goodness of God leads you to repentance." (Rom. 2:4 NKJV)

Herein lies the final lesson to be learned. It can be difficult at times to read reality. Things that seem to be one way may be just the opposite. Job had an awful time with this. What is going on? We do not know why things happen. We may misjudge and misunderstand. Things can be very deceiving. One thinks of the rich man and Lazarus in Luke 16. The rich man was receiving God's blessings, an abundant harvest. Did this reflect God's approval of his character? To ask is to answer. But, at the time it may well have seemed that way.

The poor man in that account, did his state reflect his spiritual status? Again, to ask is to answer. It would be easy to misjudge reality, looking at this case, if one was not privy to the whole story as given in the scriptures.

The lesson to be learned is that we cannot depend on our wisdom and judgment to direct us in life. Just because a thing seems right, whatever it is, does not make it right. God's word must direct us, believing and obeying is the only answer to life.

Solomon nailed it in closing out the book of Ecclesiastes when he said:

"The end of the matter; all has been heard. Fear God and keep his commandments, for this is the whole duty of man." (Eccl. 12:13 ESV)

This was the failure of the Jews of Jeremiah's day, they did not do that. May it not be our failure in our day.

[To download this article or print it out click here.]

If We Died With Him—Died How

2 Tim. 2:11 is another often overlooked passage on the teaching that baptism is essential for salvation.  It reads, "For if we died with Him, we shall also live with Him." (NKJV) How does the Bible teach that a man dies with Christ? 

“Or do you not know that as many of us as were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into His death? Therefore we were buried with Him through baptism into death, that just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. For if we have been united together in the likeness of His death, certainly we also shall be in the likeness of His resurrection, knowing this, that our old man was crucified with Him, that the body of sin might be done away with, that we should no longer be slaves of sin. For he who has died has been freed from sin. Now if we died with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with Him." (Rom. 6:3-8 NKJV) 

What if, however, we do not die to sin in baptism (we refuse to be baptized)?  The text says, "He who has died has been freed from sin."  Thus if there is no death to sin in baptism there is no promise of life for there is no freedom from sin.   To refuse to be baptized for the remission of sins is a dangerous, even deadly, thing—a thing that holds no promise of life.

[To download this article or print it out click here.]