Some
time ago, I wrote an article entitled, "Peter's Second Gospel Sermon –
Acts 3." I would refer the reader to that article before reading this one.
I thought I would do a follow-up on that one to cover the subject as thoroughly
as possible.
The
thrust of that prior article was that what Peter preached on the Day of
Pentecost that a person must do to have his/her sins forgiven (Acts 2:38) is
the same thing he preached in his second sermon (Acts 3:19) and everywhere for
that matter.
Here
are the two passages side by side.
|
Acts 2:38 |
Acts 3:19 |
|
Repent |
Repent |
|
Be Baptized |
Be Converted
(NKJV) Return (NAS) |
|
For the
Remission of Sins |
Sins Blotted
Out |
One can easily see the parallels.
However, Peter in his second sermon in Acts 3 said, depending on your
translation, "be converted" (NKJV), "return" (NAS),
"turn back" (CSB), "turn again" (ESV), rather than "be
baptized" as in Acts 2:38. How does one account for this given the fact
there is but one gospel, one way of salvation from sin? One must also remember
Peter was speaking by means of the Holy Spirit in both instances.
The answer lies in this – the Acts
3:19 account uses a general term that tells the one who hears what must be done
but does not tell how to do it. The how to do it is to be baptized but the
listener is not told that. Why not? If the sinner was told he must be baptized
in Acts 2 for the remission of his/her sins and you have the same preacher, in
the same city, at nearly the same time, inspired by the same Holy Spirit, is
that preacher going to tell another audience there is another way to obtain
forgiveness? Is he changing his story? And, one must remember that many years
later this same preacher would write, "There is also an antitype which now
saves us, namely baptism." (1 Peter 3:21 NKJV) Peter was not willfully
hiding the necessity of baptism from his audience.
This was preaching that was
interrupted; the preacher was taken into custody "as they spoke."
(Acts 4:1 NKJV) There was to be no opportunity for baptism on that occasion.
The preaching began somewhat late in the day for it was around the hour of
prayer which was 3 o'clock in the afternoon (Acts 3:1) when the lame man was
healed by Peter. The preaching began after a crowd gathered as a result of
that. We are also told after Peter and John were taken into custody and jailed,
they were held over until the next day for it was already evening (Acts 4:3).
This was not a long preaching event
nor was there an opportunity for baptizing then and there. This sermon made
believers, about 5,000 (Acts 4:4). Certainly, Peter and John could not have
baptized 5,000 men alone. They could have gotten help but that would have taken
time and they were alone at the temple.
(Commentators are uncertain whether
the number 5,000 in Acts 4 represents 5,000 new believers or is the total
number of believers from the Day of Pentecost up through this day in the
aggregate. For our purposes, it does not matter; in either case, it would still
leave Peter and John with more to baptize than they could baptize alone. We
will proceed as though the 5,000 were new disciples.)
It was not going to be hard for the
5,000 to find out what was involved in being converted or turning back to the
Lord. The apostles had become well known in Jerusalem due to the miracles that
had been done. "Fear came upon every soul, and many wonders and signs were
done through the apostles." (Acts 2:43 NKJV) Peter had the opportunity to
preach in Acts 3 because he had just worked a miracle. This day was not going
to be the last opportunity for these believers to consult Peter or the other
apostles or any of the many converts already made. Where would you find them?
Generally, near the temple. They would not be hard to find.
And, add to that fact, it is likely
some or many of these 5,000 had already heard of what had happened and what had
been taught and done on the Day of Pentecost. Perhaps some had even been
present and while not converted that day had impressions made on their hearts
and minds going back to that time. If so, they likely knew baptism was a
requirement for turning back to the Lord and likely knew where they could go to
accomplish that. When we want something done in our day, we know where to go to
get it done or how to find out how to get it done. They would have been no
different.
No doubt they were anxious to have
their sins forgiven, for Peter had earlier in his speech convicted them of
their guilt in having Christ crucified (see Acts 3:13-15). Peter also tells
them, "Every soul who will not hear that Prophet shall be utterly
destroyed from among the people." (Acts 3:23 NKJV) This is motivating
speech. A man must get right with God. When a man is motivated enough, he will
seek out the ways and means of salvation.
One must always remember Jesus in
the Great Commission demanded that disciples be baptized. "Go therefore
and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father
and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit." (Matt. 28:19 NKJV) Peter would
surely have done this in Acts 3 had he had the time and opportunity. Peter was
not an anti-Christ. He did not oppose what Christ had taught them. We can be
confident the 5,000 were baptized in the days that followed. Peter was not
preaching a different gospel or a different way of salvation on that day in
Acts 3 versus what he had preached on the Day of Pentecost in Acts 2.
I add only this. The accounts of preaching we have in the New Testament are only a synopsis of all that was said on those preaching occasions. Otherwise, one has to conclude the sermons we read are the shortest sermons in history. We know not what all Peter taught the people that day in Acts 3. He may very well have taught them baptism, and it may be he was cut off by being taken into custody before he was able to say all he wanted to say. Whatever the case, he said enough, and you and I can be assured those 5,000 obeyed the same gospel that those obeyed who came before them. There is but one gospel.
[To download this article or print it out click here.]
No comments:
Post a Comment