Philip The Miracle Working Evangelist

Philip, while not an apostle, not one of the twelve, was nevertheless an important figure in the earliest days of the church. He along with Stephen were among the seven that were chosen by the church in Jerusalem to oversee the work of providing for the needs of the Hellenistic Jewish widows in the daily administration, evidently an administration of food and sustenance by the church to widows in need. The qualifications for these seven men as put forth by the apostles was that they be "men of good reputation, full of the Holy Spirit and wisdom." (Acts 6:3 NKJV)

That they were full of the Holy Spirit is readily seen by the historical account of both Stephen and Philip in Acts 6:8-8:40. Of Stephen it is said he "did great wonders and signs among the people." (Acts 6:8 NKJV) Philip did much the same as can be seen from Acts 8:6-7, 13. The people of Samaria "heeded the things spoken by Philip, hearing and seeing the miracles which he did." (Acts 8:6 NKJV) Simon, the one we often call the sorcerer, in accompanying Philip, "was amazed, seeing the miracles and signs which were done." (Acts 8:13 NKJV)

How did these two men, and our emphasis is on Philip, come to have such power? How was it granted to them and why? Was it by the laying on of the apostles' hands? We are told that was the way the Holy Spirit was conferred (Acts 8:18). Stephen and Philip were men full of the Holy Spirit before the apostles laid hands on them in Acts 6:6; read carefully Acts 6:3-6 with a view to chronology. However, this could have been a second laying on of hands in Acts 6:6 that is recorded for us. Perhaps the apostles had laid hands on them at an earlier date to confer the Holy Spirit. We just don't know.

Not every laying on of hands was for the purpose of imparting the Holy Spirit (see Acts 13:2-3). It was, on occasion, an act showing support, approval, and fellowship when commissioning others for a task, such as when Paul and Barnabas had hands laid on them as they departed on their first missionary journey.

It may be that God conferred the miraculous measure of the Holy Spirit directly himself in the early days of the church as well as through the laying on of the hands of the apostles. I have always wondered how Philip's daughters who prophesied came to have that gift. Did one of the apostles lay their hands on them?

Joel quoted God as saying, "I will pour out of My Spirit on all flesh; You sons and your daughters shall prophesy." (Acts 2:17) He did not say he would use an intermediary to do this. See also Acts 2:18. Acts 8:16 seems to imply to me, at least, that at times the Holy Spirit did fall on a baptized believer. It reads, "For as yet He had fallen upon none of them." (Acts 8:16 NKJV) That implies to me that sometimes the Holy Spirit did fall on brethren without the laying on of hands. I may be mistaken.

A number of prophets are mentioned by name in the book of Acts – Barnabas, Simeon called Niger, Lucius of Cyrene, and Manaen in Acts 13:1, Judas and Silas in Acts 15:32, and Agabus in Acts 21:10. Were they made prophets by the laying on of the apostles' hands? How about the unnamed prophets in Acts 11:27? Some were indeed made prophets that way (Acts 19:6), but did God not make any prophets without the laying on of hands? That is the question.

When Paul came to Ephesus in Acts 19 and found twelve disciples there, he asked them, "Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?" (Acts 19:2 NKJV) If the only way to receive the Holy Spirit was by the laying on of the hands of an apostle, why ask this question? The answer would have automatically been no. Paul was the first apostle to ever come to Ephesus.

The Corinthians were to "desire spiritual gifts" (1 Cor. 14:1 NKJV) and "earnestly desire the best gifts" (1 Cor. 12:31 NKJV) even though it seems the church was full of spiritually gifted people already (1 Cor. 14:26). But, Paul was not present with them as an apostle when he wrote them. How were they to acquire spiritual gifts if no apostle was present to lay hands on them, if that was the only way spiritual gifts were transmitted? Is it not possible that God would confer those gifts directly himself?

1 Cor. 14:13 says that one who speaks in a tongue ought to "pray that he may interpret." (NKJV) Interpretation of tongues was a spiritual gift, if it was to come, that would be conferred directly by God himself, not by a laying on of hands, or so it seems. The individual already had a gift, the gift of speaking in a tongue, but if he was to receive a second gift, that of interpretation, it was prayer that was needed, not the laying on of the hands of an apostle. Again, so it seems to me.

Then one wonders about the Ethiopian eunuch that Philip would convert shortly after the Samaritans (Acts 8:26-39). Philip, not being an apostle, could confer no spiritual gift to him. Was the eunuch going to be able to do the Ethiopian people much good without one or more spiritual gifts? How were they to be acquired if not directly from heaven? Did the eunuch have Philip's sermon memorized so he could teach others? He did have the scriptures, at least Isaiah, so perhaps he could have evangelized well enough without total recall, but one does wonder. It is certain he would have needed a spiritual gift to proclaim more than the first principles of Christianity to his countrymen.

The point I am getting at is that I think it likely God conferred spiritual gifts upon mankind independently of the apostles, at his discretion, during the infancy age of the church. I am certainly not denying the apostles power to confer the miraculous measure of the Spirit by the laying on of hands (Acts 8:18). The question is only about whether or not that was the one and only means of receiving such a measure in those days.

But it is a minor issue and of no real importance in view of the fact that the days of miraculous spiritual gifts have long since passed. Such gifts accomplished their purpose for that day and age, and for all time, which brings us to what that purpose was.

Why did Philip and others receive the miraculous measure of the Spirit beyond the ability to teach the truth without error? What was the purpose of wonders, signs, and miracles? The apostle John in his written account of the gospel says he recorded Jesus' signs to create belief. "And truly Jesus did many other signs in the presence of His disciples, which are not written in this book; but these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing you may have life in His name." (John 20:30-31 NKJV) So, the signs Jesus performed were to create faith.

They were also provided to confirm that the word preached was indeed the truth and from God. "How shall we escape if we neglect so great a salvation, which at the first began to be spoken by the Lord, and was confirmed to us by those who heard Him, God also bearing witness both with signs and wonders, with various miracles, and gifts of the Holy Spirit, according to His own will?" (Heb 2:3-4 NKJV)

These things have ceased today, for they are no longer needed. Once a truth has been confirmed, how many times do you have to go back and reaffirm it? Miracles, signs, and wonders that continue for centuries become commonplace and cease to amaze and create wonder. They cease to be miracles, signs, and wonders, and in doing so fail to convince of anything.

Philip's ability to perform miracles had great effect in Samaria. The biblical text says, "And the multitudes with one accord heeded the things spoken by Philip, hearing and seeing the miracles which he did." (Acts 8:6 NKJV) And then, "When they believed Philip as he preached the things concerning the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ, both men and women were baptized." (Acts 8:12 NKJV) We thus see the purpose of miracles being fulfilled.

These people were now Christians. However, they lacked spiritual gifts of any kind, for Philip, not being an apostle, could not convey the Holy Spirit in its miraculous measure to them, and God had not conveyed it to them directly. It came by the laying on of the hands of the apostles. "Through the laying on of the apostles' hands the Holy Spirit was given." (Acts 8:18 NKJV) Peter and John came to Samaria and did this for the brethren there (Acts 8:14-17).

These brethren were saved from their sins prior to receiving the miraculous measure of the Spirit. Had Peter and John never come down to Samaria, the brethren there would have still been saved. However, without miraculous gifts, it would have been hard for them to carry on once Philip left them. They were babes in Christ. There were no New Testaments. Their knowledge and understanding was likely limited to the very first principles of the gospel. One must also recognize the limitations of the human mind. How well do we remember things? How well can you argue spiritual matters from memory alone? The apostles themselves were promised the Holy Spirit to help them to remember. "But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all things that I said to you." (John 14:26 NKJV)

The need for spiritual help and guidance in every congregation established in the first century is one of the things that leads me to the belief that sometimes God likely bestowed gifts of the Spirit directly as well as through the hands of the apostles, unless we believe all congregations established in the first century were established by the apostles. We know God did the bestowing directly with Cornelius and his household, even if we believe, as I do, that on that occasion it was for a special purpose.

One other comment before closing this chapter on Philip's preaching life. Many think baptism is no part of the gospel. Philip did not think that way. He preached baptism as a part of preaching Christ and the kingdom of God. How do we know? The text does not say he did. The text does say they were baptized, "both men and women were baptized." (Acts 8:12) How did the Samaritans know anything at all about baptism if Philip did not preach it? Thus, we see to preach "the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ" (Acts 8:12 NKJV) involves preaching baptism.

The final question – did Philip preach non-essentials? He did if baptism is not essential to salvation as so many teach today. You must remember, Philip was a Holy Spirit inspired preacher. Think on that before belittling baptism.

[To download this article or print it out click here.]