Philip, while not an apostle, not one of the twelve, was
nevertheless an important figure in the earliest days of the church. He along with Stephen were among the seven
that were chosen by the church in Jerusalem to oversee the work of providing
for the needs of the Hellenistic Jewish widows in the daily administration,
evidently an administration of food and sustenance by the church to widows in
need. The qualifications for these seven
men as put forth by the apostles was that they be “men of good reputation, full
of the Holy Spirit and wisdom.” (Acts 6:3 NKJV)
That they were full of the Holy Spirit is readily seen by
the historical account of both Stephen and Philip in Acts 6:8-8:40. Of Stephen it is said he “did great wonders
and signs among the people.” (Acts 6:8 NKJV)
Philip did much the same as can be seen from Acts 8:6-7, 13. The people of Samaria “heeded the things
spoken by Philip, hearing and seeing the miracles which he did.” (Acts 8:6
NKJV) Simon, the one we often call the
sorcerer, in accompanying Philip “was amazed, seeing the miracles and signs
which were done.” (Acts 8:13 NKJV)
How did these two men, and our emphasis is on Philip, come
to have such power? How was it granted
to them and why? Was it by the laying on
of the apostles’ hands? We are told that
was the way the Holy Spirit was conferred (Acts 8:18). Stephen and Philip were men full of the Holy
Spirit before the apostles laid hands on them in Acts 6:6, read carefully Acts
6:3-6 with a view to chronology.
However, this could have been a second laying on of hands in Acts 6:6
that is recorded for us. Perhaps the
apostles had laid hands on them at an earlier date to confer the Holy Spirit.
Not every laying on of hands was for the purpose of imparting
the Holy Spirit (see Acts 13:2-3). It
was on occasion an act showing support, approval, and fellowship when
commissioning others for a task such as when Paul and Barnabas had hands laid
on them as they departed on their first missionary journey.
It may be that God conferred the miraculous measure of the
Holy Spirit directly himself in the early days of the church as well as through
the laying on of the hands of the apostles.
I have always wondered how Philip’s daughters who prophesied came to
have that gift. Did one of the apostles
lay their hands on them?
Joel quoted God as saying, “I will pour out of My Spirit on
all flesh; You sons and your daughters shall prophesy.” (Acts 2:17) He did not say he would use an intermediary
to do this. See also Acts 2:18. Acts 8:16 seems to imply to me, at least,
that at times the Holy Spirit did fall on a baptized believer. It reads, “For as yet He had fallen upon none
of them.” (Acts 8:16 NKJV) That implies
to me that sometimes the Holy Spirit did fall on brethren without the laying on
of hands. I may be mistaken.
A number of prophets are mentioned by name in the book of
Acts - Barnabas, Simeon called Niger, Lucius of Cyrene, and Manaen in Acts
13:1, Judas and Silas in Acts 15:32, and
Agabus in Acts 21:10? Were they made
prophets by the laying on of the apostles’ hands? How about the unnamed prophets in Acts 11:27? Some were indeed made prophets that way (Acts
19:6) but did God not make any prophets without the laying on of hands? That is the question.
The Corinthians were to “desire spiritual gifts”(1 Cor. 14:1
NKJV) and “earnestly desire the best gifts” (1 Cor. 12:31 NKJV) even though it
seems the church was full of spiritually gifted people already (1 Cor.
14:26). But, Paul was not present with
them as an apostle when he wrote them.
How were they to acquire spiritual gifts if no apostle was present to
lay hands on them if that was the only way spiritual gifts were transmitted? Is it not possible that God would confer
those gifts directly himself?
1 Cor. 14:13 says that one who speaks in a tongue ought to
“pray that he may interpret.” (NKJV)
This was a gift if it was to come that would be conferred directly by
God himself, not by a laying on of hands, or so it seems. The individual already had a gift, the gift
of speaking in a tongue, but if he was to receive a second gift, that of
interpretation, it was prayer that was needed, not the laying on of the hands
of an apostle. Again, so it seems to
me.
Then one wonders about the Ethiopian eunuch that Philip
would convert shortly after the Samaritans (Acts 8:26-39). Philip, not being an apostle, could confer no
spiritual gift to him. Was the eunuch
going to be able to do the Ethiopian people much good without one or more
spiritual gifts? How were they to be
acquired if not directly from heaven?
Did the eunuch have Philip’s sermon memorized so he could teach others? He did have the scriptures, at least Isaiah,
so perhaps he could have evangelized without a spiritual gift but one does
wonder.
One can go back even earlier in time. When Jesus was a babe the Bible speaks of a
man named Simeon who saw Jesus as a baby in the temple. He had been promised he would not die before
seeing “the Lord’s Christ.” (Luke 2:26 NKJV)
The Bible says “the Holy Spirit was upon him.” (Luke 2:25 NKJV) This gift did not come by the laying on of
hands. In the same chapter in Luke, we
read of Anna “a prophetess, the daughter of Phanuel, of the tribe of Asher.”
(Luke 2:36-38 NKJV) Her gift did not
come from the laying on of hands. There
were no apostles yet.
The point I am getting at is I think it likely God conferred
spiritual gifts upon mankind independently of the apostles at his discretion
during the infancy age of the church. I
am certainly not denying the apostle’s ability to confer the miraculous measure
of the Spirit by the laying on of hands.
The question is only about whether or not that was the one and only
means of receiving such a measure in those days.
But it is a minor issue and of no real importance in view of
the fact the days of miraculous spiritual gifts have long since passed. Such gifts accomplished their purpose for
that day and age and for all time which brings us to what that purpose was.
Why did Philip and others receive the miraculous measure of
the spirit beyond the ability to teach the truth without error? What was the purpose of wonders, signs, and
miracles? The apostle John in his
written account of the gospel says he recorded Jesus’ signs to create
belief. “And truly Jesus did many other
signs in the presence of His disciples, which are not written in this book; but
these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of
God, and that believing you may have life in His name.” (Joh 20:30-31 NKJV) So, the signs Jesus’ performed were to create
faith.
They were also provided to confirm the word that was
preached was indeed the truth and from God.
“How shall we escape if we neglect so great a salvation, which at the
first began to be spoken by the Lord, and was confirmed to us by those who
heard Him, God also bearing witness both with signs and wonders, with various
miracles, and gifts of the Holy Spirit, according to His own will? (Heb 2:3-4
NKJV)
These things have ceased today for they are no longer
needed. Once a truth has been confirmed
how many times do you have to go back and reaffirm it? Miracles, signs, and wonders that continue
for centuries become commonplace and cease to amaze and create wonder. They cease to be miracles, signs, and wonders
and in doing so fail to convince of anything.
Philip’s ability to perform miracles had great effect in
Samaria. The biblical text says, “And
the multitudes with one accord heeded the things spoken by Philip, hearing and
seeing the miracles which he did.” (Act 8:6 NKJV) And then, “When they believed Philip as he
preached the things concerning the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ,
both men and women were baptized.” (Act 8:12 NKJV) We thus see the purpose of miracles being
fulfilled.
These people were now Christians. However, they lacked spiritual gifts of any
kind for Philip not being an apostle could not convey the Holy Spirit in its
miraculous measure to them and God had not conveyed it to them directly. It came by the laying on of the hands of the
apostles. “Through the laying on of the
apostles’ hands the Holy Spirit was given.” (Acts 8:18 NKJV) Peter and John came to Samaria and did this
for the brethren there (Acts 8:14-17).
These brethren were saved from their sins prior to receiving
the miraculous measure of the Spirit.
Had Peter and John never come down to Samaria the brethren there would
have still been saved. However, without
miraculous gifts it would have been hard for them to carry on once Philip left
them. They were babes in Christ. There were no New Testaments. Their knowledge and understanding was likely
limited to the very first principles of the gospel. One must also recognize the limitations of
the human mind. How well do we remember
things? How well can you argue spiritual
matters from memory alone? The apostles
themselves were promised the Holy Spirit to help them to remember. “But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the
Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and bring to your
remembrance all things that I said to you.” (John 14:26 NKJV)
The need for spiritual help and guidance in every
congregation established in the first century is one of the things that leads
me to the belief that sometimes God likely bestowed gifts of the spirit
directly as well as through the hands of the apostles unless we believe all
congregations established in the first century were established by the
apostles. We know God did the bestowing
directly with Cornelius and his household even if we believe, as I do, that on
that occasion it was for a special purpose.
One other comment before closing this chapter on Philip’s
preaching life. Many think baptism is no
part of the gospel. Philip did not think
that way. He preached baptism as a part
of preaching Christ and the kingdom of God.
How do we know? The text does not
say he did. The text does say they were
baptized, “both men and women were baptized.” (Acts 8:12) How did the Samaritans know anything at all
about baptism if Philip did not preach it?
Thus we see to preach “the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ”
(Acts 8:12 NKJV) involves preaching baptism.
The final question – did Philip preach non-essentials? He did if baptism is not essential to
salvation as so many teach today. You
must remember Philip was a Holy Spirit inspired preacher. Think on that before belittling baptism.
[To download this article or print it out click here.]
